The Golden Touch™
Free e-newsletter
About the 'Captain'
precision shooting
craps classes
GTC: the world's greatest instructors
instructor certification program
what our students say
craps class packages
photo galleries
non-disclosure agreement
NEW Sports Service
Media Information
about Frank Scoblete
about Dominator
media video Media Video
The Gambler's Outpost
Full Sized Regulation Casino Craps tables
books and tapes
e-books
practice rigs
regulation dice
Casino Apparel
casino chips
Smart Craps software
All software
Craps Club Forum
Articles
Gambling Quote of the Week
Updated: Frank Scoblete's Wisdom
Dominator's Domain
Updated: Stickman's Stance
Guest Columns
Updated: Geek Corner with Dan
Updated: Burton About Poker
Greg Scoblete Blog
G. Scoblete at RealClearWorld.com
Updated: The Skinny from Skinny
The Goddess Speaks
Updated: Tamburin on Blackjack
Current Craps Conditions
World Records
World Records and Achievements
NEW DeMauro Breaks The Captain's Record
The Captain Rolls 147 Numbers
Tamburin Sets World Record
2006 World Craps Championship Results
2009 World Craps Championship Results
All About Craps
The Words of Craps
Craps Glossary
Odds and Edges
Members Only Pages
message boards
chat room
archives
get-togethers
join
Post of the Month
Articles
Taking Advantage of Non-Random "Random" Craps - Part 2
Is Random Craps Really Random? - Part 1
Dealers Shouldn't Play a Private Game
There's No Such Thing as Responsible Gaming
To Bet or Not to Bet—With or Against the Trend, That Is
Frank Scoblete's Las Vegas Diary
Why Dealers Can't Be Human
Interview with the Captain
Cut the Hedges from Your Game
Get Yourself a Craps Table!
home
contact us
privacy policy
additional craps info
useful links
site map

Online Blackjack at OnlineBlackjackOdds.com






Toll-Free
866 Set Dice
1 | 866 | 738 | 3423

    Golden Touch™ CRAPS

Can I improve my chances of winning with multiple bets?

A poster on the GTC private website had the following question:

My math mind is saying that the more bets you have on the board the better chance there is for a win. My gaming mind (experience) says this doesn't work. I think that the assumption that if you have two bets at 1.65 vig that the vig will go down to .83 and as far as I understand it does not.

I answered the poster’s question by giving an in depth explanation of the math involved when one makes multiple wagers. I am warning you in advance, this is strictly for those interested in numbers. If that is not "your thing" you are not going to enjoy this article.

Here is my answer to that poster:

Let me give you a specific example and see if that helps.

The house advantage (HA) on a place bet of the 6 or 8 is 1.52%. This means I can expect to lose 1.52% of All the money I wager when I place the 6 and/or 8 in a random game. If I just place the 6, I can expect to lose 1.52% of All the place bets I make on the 6. If I just place the 8, I can expect to lose 1.52% of All the place bets I make on the 8. If I place both the 6 and 8, I can expect to lose 1.52% of All the money I place on each of them.

That is the simple answer to your question. If you are curious and want to see how that works, I will now show how that calculation is made. If the math is confusing to you, then stop here and accept the above as being correct.

In a random game, I know that in the long run the probabilities of dice will average out and I can expect to see 5 sixes, 5 eights and 6 sevens thrown out of every 36 rolls. Of course it will not happen like this exactly every session or over a short number of rolls necessarily. But it will average out to that over a significantly large number of rolls.

Let us say I place the 6 only for $6. On average over 36 rolls, I can expect to win $7 on that bet 5 times and lose $6 on it 6 times. Thus I can expect to win $35 and lose $36 for a net loss of $1. I will have made this bet 11 times @ $6 each, having wagered a total of $66 on my place bet of the 6. My net loss ($1) divided by my total amount wagered ($66) yields a HA of 1/66 = 1.52%

Another way of looking at it is, I make a $6 place bet on the 6, 11 times, wagering a total of $66 on this place bet. I can expect to lose 1.52% of the $66 I wagered on the 6 which equals 1.52% X $66 = .0152 X $66 = $1

Obviously the same thing is true if I were to place the 8 instead because they both have the same probability of winning or losing.

Now let's look at what happens if I place the 6 and 8 together for $6 each. I can expect to win my wager on the 6, 5 times out of 36. I can expect to win my wager on the 8, 5 times out of 36. I can expect to lose both bets 6 times out of 36.

This means I can expect to win $7 on the 6, 5 times for $35; I can expect to win $7 on the 8, 5 times for $35; I can expect to lose $12 on the 6 and 8, 6 times for $72. I will end up with $70 - $72 for a net loss of $2. I will have wagered $6 on the 6, the 5 times I win the bet for $30, $6 on the 8, the 5 times I win that bet for $30 and $12 on the 6 and 8, the 6 times I lose both bets for $72. I will have wagered a total of $30 + $30 + $72 = $132 on the 6 and 8. Dividing my net loss (-$2) by the total amount wagered ($132) yields the following formula for the calculation of the HA. 2/132 = .0152 = 1.52%

I can also look at it as follows. If I wager a total of $132 by placing both the 6 and 8, I can expect to lose 1.52% of the total amount wagered. 1.52% X $132 = .0152 X $132 = $2

Let me know if this answers your question.

© copyright 2003 | Golden Touch™ Craps International, LLC | all rights reserved | Privacy Policy